After being charged with a crime in Charlotte, NC, most people turn to a lawyer for help. In fact, having the ability to have a lawyer represent you in a criminal matter is a right given to everyone under the Constitution. However, some people decide that they would rather represent themselves in the judicial system. These people are called Pro Se litigants. Pro Se is a Latin term meaning, "for oneself" or "on one's own behalf." However, although individuals are allowed to start a legal proceeding at their own leisure as a Pro Se litigant in civil matters, this is not the case in criminal matters. In order to be allowed to represent yourself in criminal matter, a judge must grant you permission due to the potential consequences of a criminal conviction.
In determining whether an individual is capable of representing themselves as a Pro Se litigant in a criminal matter, a judge must decide whether an individual is competent. To do this, a judge will look at the defendant's level of education, their age, their verbal and language ability, and the nature and severity of the crime. These are some of the basic things a judge is looking for in evaluating a defendant's ability to represent themselves. If the judge approves, the defendant must willingly and knowingly give up their right to an attorney. After doing this, the defendant will be allowed to proceed with their case.
Sometimes, people who are not mentally fit or competent attempt to represent themselves in a criminal matter. In these instances, the judge has the right to override the request due to mental incompetency. In this case, often a mental or psychological expert will be called in to decide if the defendant's mental state is sufficient to represent themselves. They will be asked to give expert opinion on whether the defendant is mentally competent to represent themselves, and also if they are mentally fit to stand trial. In the event that they are deemed mentally unfit to stand trial, self-representation is a moot point. If a judge finds that a person is competent to stand trial, they still may rule that the defendant is not mentally competent to represent himself or herself, Pro Se.
It is typically considered a very bad idea to be a Pro Se litigant, unless your charges are very minor. Even, it is not recommended. One of the reasons for this is that in the event any procedural mistakes are made during your trial, representing yourself means you waive your rights to an appeal or mistrial. It could also be argued that the average person does not possess the knowledge required to navigate legal proceedings effectively. Given the complexity of criminal proceedings, and the availability of options for defendants in the form of private lawyers, court appointed lawyers and public defenders, it seems like a bad move with dire consequences to choose to represent you in a criminal matter.
If you or someone you know have been charged with a crime, it is important to consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney that can help zealously defend your case. Contact Us at Minick Law, P.C. for a free consultation on your case.
In determining whether an individual is capable of representing themselves as a Pro Se litigant in a criminal matter, a judge must decide whether an individual is competent. To do this, a judge will look at the defendant's level of education, their age, their verbal and language ability, and the nature and severity of the crime. These are some of the basic things a judge is looking for in evaluating a defendant's ability to represent themselves. If the judge approves, the defendant must willingly and knowingly give up their right to an attorney. After doing this, the defendant will be allowed to proceed with their case.
Sometimes, people who are not mentally fit or competent attempt to represent themselves in a criminal matter. In these instances, the judge has the right to override the request due to mental incompetency. In this case, often a mental or psychological expert will be called in to decide if the defendant's mental state is sufficient to represent themselves. They will be asked to give expert opinion on whether the defendant is mentally competent to represent themselves, and also if they are mentally fit to stand trial. In the event that they are deemed mentally unfit to stand trial, self-representation is a moot point. If a judge finds that a person is competent to stand trial, they still may rule that the defendant is not mentally competent to represent himself or herself, Pro Se.
It is typically considered a very bad idea to be a Pro Se litigant, unless your charges are very minor. Even, it is not recommended. One of the reasons for this is that in the event any procedural mistakes are made during your trial, representing yourself means you waive your rights to an appeal or mistrial. It could also be argued that the average person does not possess the knowledge required to navigate legal proceedings effectively. Given the complexity of criminal proceedings, and the availability of options for defendants in the form of private lawyers, court appointed lawyers and public defenders, it seems like a bad move with dire consequences to choose to represent you in a criminal matter.
If you or someone you know have been charged with a crime, it is important to consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney that can help zealously defend your case. Contact Us at Minick Law, P.C. for a free consultation on your case.
About the Author:
Learn more about Charlotte, NC Criminal Defense Attorneys. Stop by Minick Law's site where you can find out all about their Criminal Defense Lawyers and what they can do for you.
No comments:
Post a Comment